Editorial Understatement
Today's The Tennessean editorial on congressional ethics, with an air of profundity, concludes, "Neither [the Republican or Democratic] party has a monopoly on ethical conduct."
I wasn't aware that either party really had much market share, much less a monopoly. Nonetheless, why try for profundity when stating the obvious is so much easier and brings in the same amount of revenue?
I wasn't aware that either party really had much market share, much less a monopoly. Nonetheless, why try for profundity when stating the obvious is so much easier and brings in the same amount of revenue?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home